Dow+-+Native+PTCs

__@ Groves v. Dakota__ No tribal incentives 8 Plan--Allow natives PTCs for wind Development Adv Natives in poverty Structural violence = suffering & death x99 Poverty w/o war xGillian 00 Moral Ob dehum Dehum o/w xBerube 97 Otherization Adv Postcolonial policy hurts natives xRobyn 2 Otherization self-critical x5 Economic pressure = forced choice x97 Denies culture of natives x Otherization = basis of cruelty and NW x Katz 99 Solvency PTCs meet community needs Key to development Decolonization = real oppression disempowers xCook 92 Rejection not enough action needed xLaduke Decolonization  à genocide, must have action first xPorter 92 // 2AC // Case--AT: Consequentialism in 2AR dehum o/w impacts; Dehum & otherization = root cause of impacts; AT: PTCs = corp exploitation 1) Doesn’t’ assume plan, assumes SQ, 2) We solve view of disposability xRobyn 2; Extend Cook and Laduke acion is key to give meaning to lfie, rejection = real oppression. Lopez—Tribes need FG; 50 State fiat; FG = suppresses action xRobyn 2; perm: do both xJure 98; FG key to social change xRule 5; States illegal contradicts fed law x; Condo bad; no fism impact; fism = tism x. Politics—stimulus wont pass; case o/w; collases system. Cap—N/L; case = DA to alt; rejection doesn’t solve c/a Cook & Laduke; dehum o/w impacts, perm: every other instance; no i/l to impacts, recognization solves otherization Robyn 2, must struggle towards something; alt doesn’t solve poverty; we = first step to solve, alt = real oppression; poverty still exists post alt.